Can Curtis Granderson be the next Keith Hernandez?

Granderson HernandezAt the Winter Meetings in Florida last week, legendary sports reporter Peter Gammons spoke about the Mets signing Curtis Granderson. Like most people who were asked, he thought that the signing was a good turnaround for a club that’s refrained from spending any substantial money in the past three years, and hasn’t had a successful free agent signing since Carlos Beltran. One specific thing Gammons mentioned was that Granderson is a fantastic guy. Gammons highlighted Granderson’s consistent charity work, his on-the-field work ethic, and general positive demeanor in the clubhouse. He likened Granderson to the Mets’ David Wright, a class-act in his own right. He called them two of the greatest human beings in the game of baseball. While this may have helped some Mets fans feel warm and fuzzy, we all know where nice guys usually finish.

Before we delve further, let’s take a trip back in time. In 1983, the Mets made a trade for a dynamite first baseman named Keith Hernandez, who at 29 was already a fiery veteran who won a championship with the St. Louis Cardinals. What Hernandez brought to the team was grit, high-quality performance, and a winning, if sometimes off-putting attitude. He helped solidify the lineup and brought a sparkling glove to first. Conversely, Granderson was not traded, will be 33 when he puts on a Mets uniform, and does not have the high batting average that Hernandez possessed.

Comparing Granderson to Hernandez is apple to oranges, but that’s not really the point. Granderson is joining a Mets squad that is teeming with stellar young arms, much like Hernandez did back in 1983. Hernandez did not make the Mets winners all by himself, but his experience being on a winning team certainly helped. That is what Granderson can bring, and in that way can emulate Hernandez. Being a nice guy is wonderful, but it will only help the Mets so much. Granderson needs to show the Mets how to win.

It’s still too early to tell if Matt Harvey will regain his Doc Gooden-like aura on the mound when he returns in 2015. And while the young arms of Gooden, Ron Darling, Sid Fernandez, Jesse Orosco and Roger McDowell all panned out well enough to bring New York a title in 1986, today’s young studs are still just coming up through the minors. It’s reminiscent enough, though, to make a Met fan dream. Maybe Granderson, Chris Young and Bartolo Colon can make this team marginally better. Maybe that will help the young guys coming up through the farm system believe in a winning attitude. Maybe that franchise-wide winning attitude brings in another key free agent in a couple of years, like when Gary Carter joined in 1985. Maybe, just maybe, the Mets will have something going then.

That’s a lot of maybes, unfortunately. Colon is in his 40s, Young hasn’t been an everyday player since 2011, Granderson’s power might not translate to Citi Field, and the young guns are still not proven. But Mets fans now have something to hang their hats on. This team is spending money in an effort to compliment young talent coming up through the minors, and these new guys have been on winning clubs. So yes, nice guys usually finish last. But maybe a couple of great human beings can help bring a championship back to Queens.

8 comments for “Can Curtis Granderson be the next Keith Hernandez?

  1. December 17, 2013 at 8:34 am

    The biggest difference is that Carter as a catcher was the missing piece to be added to the roster. The Mets of 2014 should be better than the 2013 intramural squad which opened the season. Granderson is a welcomed addition to an offensively challenged outfield. Keep adding the pieces, pray that Travis D’Arnaud finds improves and becomes the catcher everyone is expecting, promote Terry Collins to scouting and bring in a manager who will not only take this team to the playoffs but the World Series as well.

  2. amazin
    December 17, 2013 at 9:43 am

    It’s a rebuilding team. It’s not Granderson, Colon and Young, it’s guys like Wheeler, Syndrgard, d’Arnaud, Flores, Duda or Ike, den Dekker, Lagares, Mejia, Familia, and Edgin.

  3. Chris
    December 17, 2013 at 9:56 am

    The Mets effectively replaced Byrd’s production and hopefully got a bridge to replace Harvey’s production. So the way I see it they stayed in place. Unless they get another good bat and a quality shortstop and a decent bull pen they are still a 77 win team. The NEXT steps push them forward. Those steps the Wilpons rarely take. If they don’t continue to build this winter I won’t be excited at all about the team in 2014.

  4. December 17, 2013 at 10:03 am

    Chris that’s not fair. As much as I can’t stand the Wilpons, they did spend the money when they had it.

    • Chris
      December 17, 2013 at 7:00 pm

      Pete, I know they spent money but we were always one or two players short. Remember Guerrero’s “bad back.” That is one example of that extra guy who could have made a difference back in the day. They spent money…less than last year when you look at what came off the books and the extra TV money that Alderson changed the subject on when asked about it….but they still need a shortstop and another legit bat otherwise they spent money to run in place…77 wins once again. That’s just reality.I would rather have spent 11.5 per year for Hudson but Colon will do. Cory Hart at first base would have added reliable pop to the lineup…a trade for Matt Kemp would convince me otherwise even if they have to trade a pitcher…otherwise the offense will be about the same. Young hasn’t been good since 2011 and last year hit around .200 but they spent 7.5 million on him. Really ???

      • Patrick Albanesius
        December 17, 2013 at 9:11 pm

        I actually like your team a lot. I’m not sure about Corey Hart, but I’m also not sure about Chris Young.

  5. Patrick Albanesius
    December 17, 2013 at 12:12 pm

    Haha, that picture of Granderson is hilarious! Made my day. I agree amazin that the youth is probably more vital than any piece the Mets have purchased this winter. But youth alone rarely gets the job done.

  6. Sean Flattery
    December 17, 2013 at 3:53 pm

    Images I’ll never forget are shots of Keith smoking cigarettes in the dugout. I would’ve loved to hear the discussions between Keith and Davey Johnson that ended in that allowance. Too funny

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *