Zack Wheeler gave the Mets seven strong innings on Saturday, the ninth time this season he’s pitched that long into the game. In the past, one of the criticisms of Wheeler was that he threw so many pitches that he had to leave the game early and ended up being a strain on the bullpen. After his rotten first two starts of the year, Wheeler has gone at least six innings in 13 of his last 14 starts. He sits in fifth place among National League pitchers with 101.2 IP.

Right now the question is what to do with Wheeler, who’s an impending free agent. It’s easy to look at his 4.69 ERA and conclude that he’s not worth what he’ll be able to command on the open market. For the sake of argument – at least in this graph – let’s assume that’s true. The Mets have to decide which is better for them. Do they aggressively shop Wheeler at the deadline or do they hold onto him, get whatever value they can for the remainder of 2019 and then extend him the QO, with the idea they may get him for another season if he takes it and get a draft pick if he doesn’t?

The Mets are in the midst of their toughest stretch of the season, a slate where they play 28 straight games against teams that have designs on a playoff spot. So far, the club is holding its own, going 7-8 in this stretch. Throughout history, regardless of sport, the idea is to play .500 against the good teams and clean up against the bad ones. Unfortunately, the Mets were two games under .500 when this stretch started. The good news is that they haven’t been buried by this stretch. The bad news is that there are just 85 games left to play and the club is eight games behind the division-leading Braves.

If your belief is that Wheeler isn’t worth what he’ll get in free agency, the team’s shot at a postseason berth here in 2019 will have to factor into the decision on what to do with him. Now, it may not be the ultimate factor. If some club in the hunt offered Jarred Kelenic and Justin Dunn, you’d be a fool not to take that deal. But likely that type of trade won’t magically appear.

This time last year, there were rumors that the Mets were going to deal Wheeler at the deadline. In 11 starts from June 1 to July 29, Wheeler had a 3.20 ERA and a 1.152 WHIP. But his poor start was masking his overall strong pitching, as he had a 4.11 ERA at the deadline. Allegedly, at least six teams expressed interest in Wheeler. Somewhat surprisingly, not one rejected trade offer made its way into the public realm. We know the Mets didn’t receive what they felt were reasonable offers but we have no idea what those offers were.

Is Wheeler’s trade value higher now than it was a season ago? On one hand, you have what he did in August and September last year, nine starts with a 1.74 ERA, buttressing what he did in June and July. On the other hand, he has just two more months of team control available now, plus the fact that he hasn’t repeated his 2018 season.

Or has he?

Last year in 29 starts, Wheeler put up a 4.2 fWAR. This year in 19 starts, he has a 2.1 fWAR. If his final three months are anything remotely like his close from 2018, he’ll actually end up with a higher mark in that category. Would you bet the mortgage on it? No, it’s far from a slam dunk. But it also has a reasonable shot of happening, maybe 35% or so. Whether that number is right or not, it’s big enough not to dismiss outright.

Of course, fWAR uses FIP instead of ERA as one of its inputs. FIP ends up normalizing things such as BABIP and LOB% – areas where Wheeler is currently underperforming. It does not normalize HR rate. However, that’s what xFIP does and we see that Wheeler in 2018 had a 3.81 ERA while the 2019 version checks in with a 3.88 mark in that category. From a quality standpoint, Wheeler is pitching essentially the same this year as a season ago. But instead of “luck” shaving a half a run off his xFIP, like it did in 2018, it’s adding 0.81 to his ERA currently.

In his first eight starts of the season, covering 49.2 IP, Wheeler had a 4.35 ERA. What was hurting him in this stretch was the one-two combo of a .336 BABIP and an 8.9 BB%. He was simply allowing too many baserunners. His strikeouts and homers allowed were very strong in this stretch. But in the seven outings from May 16 to June 17, he had a normal .305 BABIP and a 4.6 BB%. But his HR rate skyrocketed in this span, as he allowed 11 HR in 45 IP, which led to a 5.60 ERA.

No pitcher can succeed in the long run with an 18.3 HR/FB rate, which is what Wheeler had in that last stretch detailed above. Last year, Jon Gray of the Rockies had the highest HR/FB rate in the majors among qualified pitchers with an 18.1 mark. He finished the year with a 5.12 ERA.

Seeing Wheeler’s outing yesterday, where he did not serve up a gopher ball and allowed 1 ER in 7 IP, is an encouraging sign. But even that comes with a caveat, as a ball that Addison Russell hit to center field with two runners on base in the second inning seemed to be knocked down by the wind. But no one blinks an eye over wind-blown homers or wall scrapers. That’s baseball – these things happen and over the course of a season, you hope they even out.

And that’s where FIP and xFIP comes in. If you accept that in the long haul that these things do even out – that a guy with a lifetime .299 BABIP and a 73.2 LOB% and an 11.4 HR/FB rates isn’t defined by a small stretch with a .336 BABIP or a 67.2 LOB% or an 18.3 HR/FB – then you know better than to define Wheeler by his current 4.69 ERA.

Can he improve on those numbers going forward? We’ve already seen it with the BABIP. Hopefully yesterday was the start of the LOB% and HR/FB rates. We saw last year what Wheeler at his best could give you. Shoot, we even saw a reasonable facsimile of it this year in a six-game stretch. From April 12 to May 10, he had a 2.93 ERA and a 1.225 WHIP despite a .340 BABIP. The key was that he only allowed 2 HR in 40 IP in that span.

Virtually no pitcher is the same over an entire season. There will be peaks and valleys throughout the year. Just like a stretch last year with an ERA under 2.00 shouldn’t be the expectation for Wheeler, neither should a shorter stretch this year with a 5.60 ERA. In fact, let’s look at his numbers since the start of 2018, where he seems to have finally put the earlier injury problems behind him.

In his last 45 games, a span of 284 IP that includes both great and horrible stretches, Wheeler has a 3.80 ERA, a 3.42 FIP and a 3.83 xFIP. This seems to be a reasonable expectation of who he is. Certainly, it’s how Wheeler will want to be paid in his next contract. Some will point to Dallas Keuchel and his troubles getting a long-term deal this past winter. That certainly should be a sobering thought for Wheeler and his agent.

And it might be the last hope for Wheeler and the Mets to agree on a long-term deal. His poor ERA this year and the less-than-robust free agent market the past few seasons might make Wheeler more open to an extension than he was this past winter. Not that the Mets seemed in any hurry to offer him one then.

In his last two seasons before free agency, Keuchel had a combined 5.6 fWAR. Wheeler already has 6.3 fWAR with half a year left to add (or subtract) to that total. You can say that no front office makes its decisions based on fWAR. And while you are probably right, it’s an objective measure that gives us one data point into how one might perceive worth.

Keuchel ended up signing for a pro-rated portion of the QO, which he had rejected earlier. His belief he was worth more than that didn’t come true in the marketplace. It’s easy to imagine the same thing happening to Wheeler. So, if the market won’t pay “market value,” what’s the tradeoff in dollars for multiple years that works for both Wheeler and the Mets?

That answer is far from clear. But my hope is that the front office and Wheeler’s reps are working on that right now. My opinion is that there’s untapped value left in Wheeler and my preference is to see that happen in a Mets uniform. Even if you don’t share that point of view, you should still be concerned how the Mets will replace the innings Wheeler has given them this season.

12 comments on “Zack Wheeler and the trade deadline decision

  • TexasGusCC

    Five minutes ago, Kevin Kernan tweeted out that the process has begun to make Rosario a centerfielder. Don’t know where that came from, but he also tweeted a picture of the outfield in a cloudy day in Wrigley… Rosario’s “mentors” got him kicked to the outfield grass. I’d just trade him already.

    I know this is t Wheeler related, but it seems to be deadline related.

    • Pete

      How about Rosario, Smith and… for Lindor?

      • TexasGusCC

        Pete, I don’t think the Mets would tear their team apart to get him. They are too far away and don’t have the spare pieces to do this. For instance, can they afford Rosario, Alonso, and Syndergaard for Lindor? That’s what I’d start the offer, and if I were Cleveland that isn’t a “for sure” interest because Alonso isn’t proven and plays a position where offense is easier to find while Lindor is at a premium position, Syndergaard is inconsistent and gets hurt but is talented, and Rosario is a project albeit still young.

  • Pete

    I don’t see the Mets making ma QO to Wheeler. If he accepts it the Mets payroll for 2020 would be about 145 million. And that’s before any arb hearings. The Mets can’t take a chance that Wheeler takes them up on their offer. So the team gets stuck paying Zack 17 – 18 million dollars for a 3 starter? Better ways to use what little they have left of their 2020 budget. I think a better way to look at the Mets current situation is their wildcard chances. Forget the division. The Brewers, Rockies and Phillies are dropping back to .500. St Louis is inconsistent. Kinda reminds me of the Mets. San Diego looks to be a year away. So I think the Mets will wait until the last minute to make a decision.

    • Brian Joura

      You bring up valid payroll concerns. Alderson had the Mets set up nicely to afford their pitchers even with the Wilpon payroll and then the Cano deal happened and the deGrom extension came earlier than needed. BVW has painted the Mets into this corner.

      • TexasGusCC

        Yup. Doesn’t BVW look to be a short term guy based on how much he invests in “today” at the expense of tomorrow?

  • MattyMets

    Andy Martino has been promoting option C for Wheeler and I agree. Make him a contract offer now – like 4/60 for openers. Lock him up as our #2. If we’re out of contention, trade Syndergaard who is younger and has more control and thus more value. I’d prefer to keep all 4 of our horses but I doubt that’s possible with the Wilpon purse strings.

    • Mike Walczak

      So far, the four horses have been one horse and three ponies.

      The decision on Wheeler is a very tough one. The question is, who replaces him next year?

      I would try to see what value you get for him now and see how it plays out. If he has a few good starts his value will increase. The Yankees are going to be hungry for a starter.

      Would not give him a qualifying offer, because if he doesnt accept it, it will be another Keuchel situation.

      As for Rosario, moving him to the outfield will not mask his horrid on base percentage.

      Mets need to have a long term plan and think of their moves at least three years in advance. Spend the money on the plum that they drafted in the third round.

      They should also trade Vargas. Let’s build the farm system.

      The Mets have a good core of players with deGrom, Alonso, McNeil, and Conforto. Build around them.

      • Metsense

        The Mets should definitely submit qualifying offer to protect their investment.
        Wheeler is worth the money and Wheeler would worry that he might be another Keuchel. The Mets would have leverage at this point.
        According to Fangraphs in 2018 in the NL Wheeler was ranked #6 in fWAR, #5 in FIP, #11 in ERA,#13 in innings,#11 in k/9 and #5 in WHIP. These stats would qualify him for a qualified offer.

  • Metsense

    Brian, you have presented unbiased facts and your conclusion I endorse most heartily. The Mets should sign Wheeler now. Last winter, the qualifying offer was $17. 9 M. If the Mets don’t sign him now then they will make a qualifying offer this winter to protect their investment. The Mets should offer 3/54 and no more than 4/72 and no trade clause.
    If Wheeler walks away from that security then the Mets should try to trade him with a value that is more than the draft pick. If the Mets improve their playoff position then they might have to keep him because he would be an asset to obtain a potential playoff spot. Then in the off-season make him a qualifying offer.
    BWV should have extended Wheeler last offseason.If Wheeler didn’t accept the deal the Mets should have traded him during the last offseason.
    At times, Wheeler has pitched like #1 starter. With this offer he would be paid like a number 2 or 3 starter and the fan base should accept and except that kind of production.

    • Metsense

      I meant to say that the Mets should not give him a “no trade clause”.

  • Chris F

    I would offer him 13M$/year for 3 or 4 years with an ASG deadline to accept. if he doesn’t, I’d trade him for what might be a decent prospect, but rentals don’t get what they used to. Like no one will give up a number one prospect unless you are getting a number 1 rental. I can envision any reason to offer Wheeler a QO. If we trade him, then Id monitor his market in the off season. At any moment Wheeler can be a CY winner or a Little Leaguer. Not

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 100 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here