Back when I had the time to follow the Mets minor league system much more closely than I’m able to today, I fell into the trap of “falling in love” with several of the Mets’ prospects more often than I care to admit. They tend to break your heart, as the saying goes, and over the years there have been plenty that I thought were sure to be the next Mets superstar only for them to never even sniff the major leagues (if not for those injuries, Reese Havens!).

When Michael Conforto was drafted in 2014, he instantly became one of the players I was most excited to see develop. I even made it a point to watch him play in Double-A when the old Binghamton Mets rolled into Bowie in 2015 shortly before his call to the show. Those were seemingly simpler times in Metsland.

Fast forward to 2021, and the approaching end of another disappointing Mets season is highlighted by underwhelming performances from the team’s young core of position players. The leader, if you will, of that pack of underachievers is Conforto himself. At the conclusion of what will be his worst season to date, it’s starting to look like he may be positioning himself as one of the most frustrating subcategories of heart-breaking prospects. Rather than being one of the innumerable “never was” prospects the game has seen, Conforto is knocking on the door of “almost was,” which is infinitely more frustrating in many ways. Ike Davis says hello.

The book is far from written on Conforto, of course, and rumors of his (career’s) demise are greatly exaggerated at this point. He’s turned it on quite a bit recently, and he’s historically been a better second half player over his career. That streakiness can be maddening, though, particularly when set against the overarching offensive issues the team has faced this season.

Still, 2021 has been an odd season for the right fielder. He’s walked at a rate consistent with his best seasons (12.5 BB%), and he’s striking out less than ever (minus his rookie year) by a good bit (21.8 K%). Yet he’s getting on base at one of the worst clips of his career (.339 OBP), his batting average is terrible (.222), and his slugging (.364) has cratered to well below his career norm. Just like the lineup as a whole, his performance has been beyond perplexing. Statistically, he’s also played some of the worst defense of his career. It’s possible that he’s letting his struggles at the plate spill over to the field, but he’s doing himself no favors here in terms of overall value.

Of course, the glaring statistic that has been at the heart of many Conforto conversations cannot be ignored here: his BABIP is currently sitting at .266, which is the lowest it’s been since his second-worst showing during the 2016 season. His 2020 .412 BABIP was never sustainable, but he’s put up much better seasons with a BABIP closer to the league average. In fact, almost exactly a year ago I argued that Conforto was doing the things he needed to do to create his own good luck with regard to balls in play.

To summarize that piece, as a lefty that consistently sees the shift Conforto needs to ensure he doesn’t become pull-happy in his approach. The shift appears to have a more significant effect on left-handed hitters that pull more often. He’s been consistently high on the “shifted on” leader boards throughout his career, and this season he’s seeing the shift more than ever. When combined with the fact that his pull percentage (41.3%) is almost ten points higher than last season, we start to get a picture of how things have gone off the rails for him this year. In contrast to last year, as well as the title of the aforementioned article, Conforto has been making himself some really bad luck this season. At least, he’s not doing himself any favors regarding adjustments to the shift. General bad luck can also be a contributing factor here, of course.

Conforto is clearly going to need to take steps to adjust his approach to the modern defensive game, or he’s simply never going to thrive in the modern MLB at a level he has shown he has the potential to achieve. It’s questionable if the Mets as an organization, and specifically their organizational hitting philosophy, have the capability to help him reach that potential. That disconnect between performance and potential makes the upcoming offseason an important one for both player and team. According to Anthony DiComo, the Mets are primed to extend a qualifying offer, though his sources note that it’s unlikely Conforto accepts it.

With an agent like Scott Boras, Conforto declining the offer would be one of the least surprising turn of events this winter. He’s still in the prime of his career and, arguably, may not have actually peaked to this point. He’s going to get a sizable contract from some team, but his performance this season now puts into question just how big that contract will be and whether or not that team should be the Mets. Barring some huge leap forward in the coming years, this is likely to be the 28-year-old’s best chance for a large and lengthy contract. He’s not a superstar, and at this point he likely never will be, but there’s enough here for the Mets to re-sign him for the right price. They’ll need to gamble on whether this season is a blip and if they believe there’s still more there to be unlocked when valuing what it would cost to re-sign him.

The team might be a bit gun-shy due to the early (lack of) returns on the Francisco Lindor contract, and it’s always risky negotiating with an agent you can be sure is salivating at the prospect of getting Steve Cohen to open up those coffers. For the right price, though, it’s worth locking up Conforto through his early thirties. If the price tag isn’t right the team should simply move on, wish him luck wherever he ends up, and hope he doesn’t become the latest former Met to break out.

8 comments on “Michael Conforto and the free-agency gamble

  • Steve_S.

    If we sign Conforto for the “right price” and are stuck with a pull-happy, underperforming guy in his thirties that will not be pretty.

    I wouldn’t even give him a QO, since he might take it if and when other teams are hesitant to give him a contract that Boras and Michael like.

    With Marte, Bryant and Schwaber available as free agent OFers whom we could sign without losing a draft, I would move on and let him try his luck elsewhere.

  • Footballhead

    I’ve never been enamored of Conforto, and I wouldn’t even offer him a QO. If some other team signs him, I’m sure he’ll do fine. I’m with Steve_S. Other outside options for corner OF are available to tie up $$ on a Conforto.
    Now don’t get me wrong…..he still might be a Met next year if offered a one year deal to redeem himself for next years free agent market. I’d gamble on that.

  • Paulc

    Time to let Conforto walk. He’ll get a contract lower than Springer’s 6/150, but in that neighborhood. Better to sign Baez at 2B or Bryant at 3B/RF. They are both more valuable players. Average bWAR over their careers (each 7-8 years) is Conforto 2, Baez 3, and Bryant 4. I doubt Bryant will sign with the Mets and Baez is eager to play with Lindor, so Baez is the likely signing. Hopefully, ownership can pull a coup to keep Stroman and Thor as the other big name FA pitchers are over 35. Semien is about equal to Baez over his career and he can play 2B/3B. Semien has had a great season, so he’ll likely get overpaid. Interesting off-season coming up.

    • Steve_S.

      The Mets need to sign more than Baez. Bryant would be ideal, since he can play 3B, then move to the OF when one of the rookies is ready. He can also play 1B and DH and PH. Why do you doubt he’d sign with the Mets? Money talks usually.

      We also need to sign another OFer (Marte?)

      I agree that we need to keep both Stroman and Thor! deGrom, Stroman, Syndergaard, Carrasco and Walker make the top 5, with Megill, Lucchesi, Williams, Peterson and maybe Hill behind them.

  • Metsense

    The Mets should make a QO to secure the draft choice. Irregardless if he take it or not the Mets primary target should be Bryant with the idea that he would be the RF which is his best defensive position. If Conforto takes the QO then he would play LF and the Mets could revisit his situation next year. If he doesn’t take it the Mets have other options in the free agent market to turn to and it would be an opportune time for the Mets to move on.
    The Mets have problems defeating LHP and Conforto has a problem hitting against LHP (.688 OPS career).

  • TexasGusCC

    Expecting Conforto to want to do the Semien route, of taking a one year deal to play in a offensive ballpark to pad the numbers, with lineup protection. Washington and Atlanta aren’t out of the question.

    Like the A’s did with Semien, I don’t see the Mets giving a QO, and if they do, he should grab it. Why turn down $19MM now to get a $5MM offer? Bad business. If he doesn’t take the QO, he will be wearing that albatross too along with his terrible year. Hence, he takes it. Do the Mets offer it?

    If Conforto is a Met next year, either Dom Smith or Jeff McNeil won’t be.

  • MattyMets

    Gus, I’m of the same mind as you. When you look at the group that includes Conforto, Smith, McNeil and Davis, it’s complicated. They’re all just entering their primes and have track records as good players and good teammates. 3 of them are affordable and versatile. One is about to get very expensive and only plays one position. If the team needs to shake things up, we have to choose very carefully which of these four come back next year. It’s a scary proposition because any time this happens the Mets always have a knack for letting the best one get away. To me, they’re all poised for a bounce back next year, but we absolutely cannot bring all four back and cross our fingers. Hmm, this gives me an idea for my Friday blog post…

    • T.J.

      Matt,
      Not only do they often let the best one get away…that best one usually finds a home on a team that they help pummel the Mets. It is tough to take but part of being a Met fan.

      My inclination right now, labor contract not withstanding, regarding the QO/free agent gamble, is to offer neither Conforto nor Syndergaard the QO. I’d be inclined to let Conforto walk given Gus’s points. I’d try to sign Syndergaard to an incentive-laden one year that would get to QO dollars based on his 2022 contributions. He says publicly he wants to stay…he has gotten $20 million the last two years without contributing…there is a deal somewhere between.

Leave a Reply to Metsense Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 100 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here