Mets’ top priority after Reyes is at closer

The Mets’ top offseason priority is to re-sign Jose Reyes. Regardless of how that turns out, the next thing on their to-do list is to acquire a closer. During the year so much of the attention was on making sure that the expensive 2012 option on Francisco Rodriguez did not vest that everyone forgot about the performance that K-Rod gave the Mets.

In save situations, Rodriguez was 23-for-26 before he was dealt to the Brewers. Without Rodriguez in the second half, the Mets blew seven games in the ninth inning. Jason Isringhausen did a decent job when he was the team’s closer but Bobby Parnell proved himself not ready for prime time. The hard-throwing youngster blew four saves. Parnell matched K-Rod’s total of three blown saves, accumulated over three-and-a-half months, in an eight-day stretch between September 3rd and September 10th.

It’s very much to be determined if Isringhausen will be back in 2012. It would be a giant leap of faith to install Parnell as the closer after what he did in his first exposure to the job last year. The only other reliever on the staff to even consider as a closer would be Manny Acosta. This is the same Acosta that the Mets found so lacking on Opening Day that they exposed him to waivers in order to keep Blaine Boyer. If Parnell is a long-shot to be the Mets’ closer in April, then we have to come up with a new term to describe the odds against Acosta getting the job.

But, while the Mets are in serious need of a closer, is it worth it to pay big bucks for a closer for a team that seems at least a year away from serious playoff consideration? On top of that, is it worth sacrificing a high draft pick as compensation for an elite free agent closer? It’s easy to imagine for Sandy Alderson the answer to that is “no” for both questions.

So, are there any relievers who would are not Type A free agents who could be upgrades on Parnell/Acosta, if not Isringhausen? Let’s take a look at some potential closers for the 2012 Mets. All free agent designations come courtesy of MLB Trade Rumors, which reverse engineers the Elias rankings. Remember, a player who is a Type B free agent nets his team a compensation draft pick, but that does not come from the team who signs him.

Jonathan Broxton (Type B) – He hasn’t been good since 2009, but he still has name value. While that may have been significant for previous GMs, it’s unlikely Alderson pays a premium for that.

Frank Francisco (Type B) – Had a 9.41 K/9 mark last year. Hurt by the long ball but generally did a solid job for the Blue Jays as he picked up 17 saves, including six in September, and posted a 3.35 xFIP. Made $4 million last year.

Jason Frasor (Type B) – Hard thrower with a solid K rate, Frasor allows more walks than you would prefer from your closer. His BB/9 has been over 3.50 in four of the past five years, including a 3.90 mark last year.

Brad Lidge (Type B) – Hasn’t been good since 2008. Lidge has battled injuries and control problems the past three years. He has allowed 71 BB in 123.2 innings over the past three seasons. Yet you still hear people clamor for the Mets to sign him.

Joe Nathan (No compensation) – Was not his dominating self last year but it was his first year back after Tommy John surgery. His velocity has mostly returned but his fastball was a below-average pitch last year according to the linear weights Pitch Type Value over at Fan Graphs. He has more upside than Broxton or Lidge but will likely command more money, too.

Chad Qualls (No compensation) – After a dismal 2010 season, Qualls turned in a useful season as a middle reliever last year. However, he had just a 5.21 K/9. He gets ground balls and doesn’t give up a lot of walks. If his strikeout rate can bounce back, he would make a very nice pickup.

Jon Rauch (Type B) – At 6’10, he would fit in with the other tall pitchers that the Mets had on their roster in 2011. But Rauch’s average fastball velocity dipped below 90 last year for the first time and the pitch was a below-average offering. He really struggled with the long ball last year, too.

Kerry Wood (Type B) – He can still light up the radar guns but he’s throwing more and more cutters as the years go by. Is probably going to end up back in Chicago, where he feels comfortable.

Joel Zumaya – Speaking of guys who light up the gun, Zumaya could give Parnell a run for his money for hardest thrower. But like Parnell, Zumaya has never been able to enjoy a full, productive season in the majors. He had the best walk rate of his career last year but his overall numbers were slanted due to a microscopic HR rate. Still, he has more potential than the more well-known names on this list.

Who do you think Alderson should target from the above list?

21 comments for “Mets’ top priority after Reyes is at closer

  1. October 24, 2011 at 5:40 pm

    Whoever it is, he will not break the bank. I could see Francisco or Rauch as they might not earn as much as others on list.’
    Since Parnell learned a new pitch from Franco he still might be in chase.

    • Ron Davis
      October 25, 2011 at 2:46 pm

      I would look at Frank Francisco he did well in Texas. But Zamaya is injury pron. Jon Rausch i like but he does not like our bench coach in Oakland. I would be for Broxton.

      • Harrison
        October 26, 2011 at 6:00 pm

        I think Jason Frasor would be good and Frank Francisco could be great because he is a fly ball pitcher and would be instantly better with two words. CITI FIELD!

  2. met fan
    October 24, 2011 at 5:49 pm

    I think Krod is coming back at a home town discount. Say 2 years/12 million. He has a kid here and he did perform well in NY,no small thing.

    • October 24, 2011 at 6:39 pm

      Somehow I think K-Rod coming back is something of a pipe dream, although I wouldn’t be against the right deal.

      If they can swing a cheaper deal for Francisco, Nathan or Frasor, I think I’d prefer that until the team gets going in the next few years.

    • mistermet
      October 24, 2011 at 7:10 pm

      I don’t see any chance of that happening. He’s likely going to be a Type A free agent if the Brewers offer him arbitration. There’s no way Alderson gives up the Mets’ 2nd round pick for a closer. The rest of the guys listed above are Type B free agents who won’t cost the Mets one of their picks. Those guys are much more likely. I still like Nathan, although Frank Francisco or Frasor could be decent options.

      • Steve S.
        October 25, 2011 at 9:11 am

        I think that Francisco for $4.5 million is our best bet. I wonder if we’d have to give him two years.

      • Tyler
        October 26, 2011 at 8:25 am

        if you offer k-rod arb you could be on the hook for probably 12 million…i dont think a team trying to keep fielder and eventually braun would be looking to spend like that.

  3. Dave Koffer
    October 25, 2011 at 3:45 am

    Try to bring back Frankie K?? He’s had success in NY despite his personal issues.

  4. October 25, 2011 at 12:23 pm

    i would like lidge or maybe octavio dotel but i agree if can get k rod back for cheap thats the best bet.

    • Rob
      October 25, 2011 at 7:13 pm

      You would want K-Rod back cheap? K-Rod is a type a free agent and the mets would lose thier first round draft pick for signing him. Losing your first round pick for a closer is not cheap.

      • Brian Joura
        October 25, 2011 at 10:54 pm

        Mets would not lose their first-round pick if they sign a Type A free agent. Because of their record being in the bottom half they would lose their second-round, instead.

        • Tyler
          October 26, 2011 at 8:27 am

          and hes not even a lock for type a…he was a setup man the 2nd half of the year. hes def our best bet if were gonna sign one guy to close games for us. unfortunately i think sandy goes the jerry reese route and gets someone decent for nothing.

  5. Michael Scarn
    October 25, 2011 at 2:44 pm

    longer shot?

  6. Bubthedrummer
    October 25, 2011 at 3:27 pm

    I say sign Pujols and let Ike Davis close

    • Brian Joura
      October 25, 2011 at 4:41 pm

      I like it!

  7. norman feldman
    October 25, 2011 at 5:20 pm

    Pitchers for 2012…..I believe the best bet should come from the Met minor leagues , what is out there on the major leagues is not worth the investment. an outfielder or catcher is a better fit to 2012

  8. David Collazo
    October 25, 2011 at 6:36 pm

    Out of all of those, I really believe Broxton has the bigger upside. Plus he’s the youngest of all of them and he can past and overcome his injury plague, he can pretty become the closer for us for years to come. Im in for broxton.

  9. October 25, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    I would like to see mets try to sign Nathan worth the risk

  10. martinex
    October 26, 2011 at 7:42 am

    I always ask this question when contemplating a big splashy free agent signing: Are we one player away from a World Series appearance? If the answer is no then don’t do it. Jose Reyes is an amazing talent but he’s fragile. He doesn’t impress me as a gym rat. Unless he gets serious about fitness his time on the DL will increase exponentially.

  11. Tyler
    October 26, 2011 at 8:29 am

    how bad do you think this team is? we were without our best pitcher and best hitter for very significant amounts of time. give me a full season of reyes pagan wright bay ike duda and bring back caps and were competing for a division title.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: