Travis d'ArnaudThe New York Mets are anticipating a healthy and solid growth year from Travis d’Arnaud this year. This contribution doesn’t necessarily have to be in the form of HRs or RBIs. A full season with 400 ABs, a decent batting average, some developing rapport with the pitching staff will likely satisfy most expectations.

But what happens if those expectations are derailed? What if (and let’s all keep our fingers crossed) he gets injured? Who will the Mets turn to?

First on the depth chart after d’Arnaud is Anthony Recker. Recker is 30; he bats right-handed and has been with the club since October of 2012, when he was selected off waivers from the Chicago Cubs organization. He was originally drafted by the Oakland Athletics in the eighteenth round of the 2005 amateur draft.

Last year, Recker appeared in 50 games, had 135 ABs, had six HRs, and knocked in 19 RBIs (he also pitched an inning for the team last year). He’s good for some power and is willing to take a walk (13 BBs last year). He ended the season with a .4 positive WAR value.

Next on the organizational depth chart would likely be Juan Centeno. What would Centeno bring to the ballclub?

He is only 24 years old. He bats left-handed. He is relatively small; he stands 5’9″ and weighs 172 lbs. He has never exhibited power in the minors but he offers superb defense (we all know that he threw out Billy Hamilton last season). If the team ends Spring Training as planned, they will head north with both d’Arnaud and Recker; Centeno will head to Las Vegas, where he will be able to develop his own rapport with the Mets AAA pitchers.

If something were to happen to d’Arnaud, could the Mets absorb another player who might not contribute to consistent run production? They’ve already got potential issues with offensive contributions at shortstop and at center field. Oliver at Fangraphs projects Centeno to have .8 WAR next year so, like Juan Lagares, he adds enough defensively to make an overall positive contribution.

In any “Centeno as catcher” scenario, we could see more low-scoring games.
If he limited an opposing team’s running game and adequately handled the pitching staff, this could be an interesting combination. With the team’s improved defense and unfolding pitching potential, we could turn a few scored runs per game into team victories. Of course, this would fall apart if there are other fielders who don’t adequately field their position.

All that being said however, the plan still is to go into 2014 with d’Arnaud as their starting catcher. So let’s hope that d’Arnaud gets his 400 plus ABs. Let’s hope that Recker hits around 10 HRs. Let’s hope that Centeno gets a call-up in September. Because after this in the pecking order is a kid named Kevin Plawecki.

5 comments on “What do we have if we don’t have d’Arnaud?

  • Joe Vasile

    Just one thing to keep in mind with Oliver is that it gives every player 600 PA, so Centeno’s projection is over a very large sample, one which he is not likely to get.

    • Jim OMalley

      Good point. But…I think the defensive metrics can be applied on a game by game basis, while offensive metrics tend to accumulate over time.

  • Metsense

    d’Arnaud needs to put up at least average NL catcher numbers, 2013 NL AVG:17 HR, 307/379/686. If he puts up better than average numbers then the Mets will impove proportionately. d’Arnaud is a difference maker.
    Recker posted 6 HR , 280/400/680 but if Travis were injured then extrapolate Recker to 400 AB’s and you would have an average NL catcher with 18 homeruns. Recker seems like an adequate backup to me. Centeno would elevate to backup and although not ideal offensively, would be strong defensively. I am secure with the Mets catching depth going into the season.
    Plawecki looked great the few times I saw him and I expect good things from him in the future. It may be time to give him a few reps at 1B to see how he adapts there. A catcher with some first base experience would only increase his value.

  • Jim OMalley

    Yeah…good point on KP. A catcher/1st base combination sounds good. ETA in Queens would be 2016 for Plawecki?

  • Metsense

    This year at AA will give the Mets a truer indication of Plawecki’s potential and 2016 is a reasonable ETA. If he continues to hit at AA like he did in A ball, the the summer of 2015 is a possibility, but I am bullish on him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 100 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here