With Juan Lagares gone, it’s possible that Brandon Nimmo is now the most polarizing player on the team. He’s below-average defensively in center field, he strikes out too often and his batting average is nothing to write home about in most years and was downright bad last season. On the flip side, he’s got great OBP skills, underrated power, is a good baserunner and he’s average or better defensively in an outfield corner.

People say he was awful before going on the IL last year for three-plus months and then rebounded to post a solid September. But that’s overselling the first part and underselling the second.

Nimmo certainly did not start off the season well, as he struck out 17 times in his first eight games and had just a .327 OPS at that point of the year. But then he started to heat up. After the game on April 16, Nimmo stood with an .851 OPS, a nice rise of 524 points in nine games.

Unfortunately, the game of April 16 is when it all started going south. He got a leadoff walk in the top of the first inning but had to come out of the game in the bottom of the frame with a stiff neck. He did not play again until April 20. From 4/20 to 5/20, Nimmo posted a .536 OPS in 93 PA. The only thing that kept that line from being worse is that they moved him out of the leadoff spot and sat him in several games, too, keeping his total PA down.

If all you do is look at the line when he went on the IL, you would conclude that he was bad before the IL trip. But that doesn’t tell the whole story. Nimmo was on the upswing before he had to miss several days. If the Mets had put him on the IL at that point, the narrative of his 2019 season would be completely different. Even if he didn’t rejoin the team until September 1, like he did in real life, his final numbers would be:


That month-long stretch when he tried to play while injured cost him 147 points of OPS from his (abbreviated) season-long line. When not playing with a bulging disc in his neck last year, Nimmo was even better than his breakout season in 2018, when he posted an .886 OPS.

There was a concern that when Nimmo was activated this past September that he would have too much rust to be useful while the Mets were battling for a playoff spot. But that turned out not to be an issue, as he notched a .995 OPS in the final month of the season. He got on base at an even better pace than in 2018 and with 10 of his 18 hits going for extra bases, he delivered more power, too.

As everyone who was a fan of David Wright knows, neck injuries are serious. But we have to distinguish between the injuries that Wright and Nimmo suffered. Wright had a herniated disc while Nimmo’s was a bulging one. The difference between the two is that Wright’s contained a rupture of the disc’s outer layer, while Nimmo’s did not. Wright’s needed surgery while Nimmo returned to action with the combination of rest and rehab.

The key question moving forward is: What is the likelihood that Nimmo will suffer more bulging discs in the future? Not being a doctor and not even staying in a Holiday Inn Express meant that my immediate best chance was to search Google and there was little immediately fruitful in my exhaustive two-minute search.

The good news is that you figure if multiple players had suffered multiple bulging discs in their careers, that’s something that would turn up immediately in a Google search. What information did turn up seemed much more centered on herniated discs, with Wright being a frequent citation, along with Prince Fielder.

The only reference found to a player by me in my two-minute search was to ex-Met Michael Cuddyer. According to this 2013 article, Cuddyer first had a bulging disc in his neck in 2004. It flared up again in 2011 and again in 2013. While with the Mets in 2015, Cuddyer went on the then-named disabled list but it was with a bone bruise in his knee. When he retired, he explained that he had been on the DL six times in the past four years and listed off the reasons – a broken shoulder, strained oblique, torn-up knee and the bulging disc in his neck.

So, the return of a bulging disc has to be a concern for Nimmo going forward. But given that it took seven years for it to return with Cuddyer, it’s not like we should be ultra-concerned about it affecting his 2020 season.

It’s fun to think about the Mets’ offense in 2020 featuring a full season with a healthy Nimmo. What he did in 2018 and in the 161 PA in 2019 when he was mostly free from the sore neck show a guy who is a difference maker. His 159 wRC+ in the month of September last year was the seventh-best mark in the National League and his .995 OPS ranked fifth. And while you might be skeptical of September stats, it’s not so easy to dismiss the 148 OPS+ mark he compiled in 2018.

Nimmo was a first-round pick and many people labeled him a bust because he didn’t come up and contribute right away, like some guys drafted after him did. Perhaps it’s those same people who were quick to label him a bust who right now think he’s nothing special. Sometimes it’s hard to know what drives the negative Nancy types. Regardless, let’s hope Nimmo has a healthy 2020 and can bolster his case for being an impact player.

11 comments on “A healthy Brandon Nimmo is an impact player

  • Rich

    Luv the guy, luv the player. I also think we should be wary of defensive metrics. Hes not Willie Mays in center but give him a chance to get some more games under his belt in CF and hope the Mets new, enhanced analytics department gets them all in better positions.

  • TJ

    A healthy Nimmo is certainly an asset. Barring inclusion in a trade for a premium player, I llok forward to his play and contributions in 2020. I’m not sure what can be done to improve outfielder throwing strength, but if Nimmo could improve to an average thrower it would be quite helpful to the Mets’ desire to improve the defense.

    • Brian Joura

      Looking at his defensive numbers, his arm was a definite negative in RF in 2018. But he barely played RF at all last year and his arm is adequate in CF or LF.

      I’d be more focused on making sure he gets good jumps on balls and catches whatever he can get to. I’ll live with the arm of a guy who can put up 4 fWAR.

  • Dan Capwell

    I doubt he is going anywhere. I envision a three-man rotation in center and left with Nimmo, JDD, and the righty-swinging centerfielder they will acquire on the cheap this offseason.

    Not that this is necessarily a bad thing.

    • Brian Joura

      My concern is that BVW has already said that Conforto isn’t going anywhere and that neither is Syndergaard. Meanwhile, he seems intent on getting a CF. That leaves Davis and Nimmo as his two biggest trade chits, unless he raids the farm system again.

  • Chris F

    My views on Nimmo have changed. I think he is a regular player, but in a corner, preferably LF. He has an unusual profile for LF, but his below passable defensive skills are exposed less. I think advanced positioning helps for sure, but he’s nothing special with a glove, and worst of all he’s unacceptable with the throw. If Nimmo goes through a long slump, then he cannot fall back on special defensive play. And we all know, with the game on the line the ball finds you fast — easy to see a situation where run(s) score late in a game because of poor defense. It’s why I think CF is a genuine hole for the Mets still.

  • Eraff

    The Mets are somewhat overstocked on LH bats, and Conforto/Nimmo have too much value to ignore as possible trade pieces. I’d be surprised to see all of McNeill, Conforto, Smith, and Nimmo back. Davis is a defensive Misfit almost everywhere, but he looks like a live and cheap bat if you can manage around his defensive liabilities.

    I expect a very active Hot Stove for the Mets.

  • Mike Walczak

    I have this feeling that with the budget issues, that BVW may only swing a deal for a piece of junk player for center field and sell it as a great move.

    • Brian Joura

      I think a minimum wage, defense-first CF is exactly what this team needs. But even those guys are hard to find.

  • Rich

    Nimmo is not flashy in any part of his game. However, he is as strong fundamentally as you can find. While his arm is “below average”, he will not throw to wrong bases, he will hit the cutoff man, and he will never try to do more than he’s capable of. He goes very deep into counts. Raises pitch counts. While he may not win many games with “Sports Center” flash, or in a “spectacular fashion” , he won’t lose games for us either. I’ll take strong fundamentals and a high “Baseball IQ” over flash and glitter 24/7.

    Editor’s Note – Please do not capitalize words in your post, as that is a violation of our Comment Policy.

  • MattyMets

    What I like most about Nimmo is the part that doesn’t show up in the stats – his energy and child-like enthusiasm. You need a guy with a goofy grin who runs to first base on a BB or HBP. We had that with Granderson too. It helps offset the Cano, Ramos, Cespedes (if he ever plays again) veteran players.

    Let’s suggest for a second the Mets get Starling Marte. Does that mean he’s flanked by Conforto and Nimmo and Davis and Smith are trade bait or would we keep one as a nice bench piece? I can’t remember the last time, if ever, the Mets had three consistent starting outfielders who all stayed healthy. It takes a four-man rotation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *