The Mets announced a bunch of moves yesterday, including one or two that seem surprising. While it was expected for Carlos Carrasco to declare for free agency and Omar Narvaez to exercise his option to remain with the club, the Mets also waived six players. Those were: Peyton Battenfield, John Curtiss, Elieser Hernandez, Bryce Montes de Oca, Denyi Reyes and Tim Locastro. By my count, that leaves 33 players on the 40-man roster, counting two guys who will need to be activated from the 60-day IL, players with options who may or may not be back and arbitration-eligible players who may still be non-tendered.

The options and non-tenders will be sorted out soon enough, which leaves promoting players who would otherwise be exposed to the Rule 5 Draft. Jeremiah Jackson is a lock to be added and there are others who will be protected as well. But let’s look at the guys currently on the 40-man:

Pitchers – Bickford, Brigham, Butto, Coonrod, Diaz, Garrett, Gott, Hartwig, Lucchesi, Megill, Murfee, Ottavino, Peterson, Quintana, Raley, Reid-Foley, Senga, Smith, Walker

Catchers/Infielders – Acuna, Alonso, Alvarez, Baty, Guillorme, Lindor, Mauricio, McNeil, Narvaez, Vientos

Outfielders/DH – Marte, Nimmo, Stewart, Vogelbach

Given how thin the outfielders are on the current 40-man, it was very surprising to me to see Locastro cut loose so soon. And, yeah, guys like Locastro are available every offseason. But he did a credible job and seemed like he would be an asset as the club’s fifth outfielder. It’s my belief that a case could be made that he would be a better fit on the club than DJ Stewart. That may seem crazy given their respective final numbers. But Stewart had a hot streak that he’s not likely to replicate going forward. At the end of the day, the Mets think it will be easier to replace Locastro’s speed and defense than it will be to replace Stewart’s power.

All of the pitchers waived are at least a tiny bit surprising, although my guess is that Montes de Oca will elicit the most hand-wringing from the fanbase. It’s my opinion that none of these five pitchers will be missed all that much. Rather, if the club was going to cut ties with Curtiss – why not Brigham, Coonrod and Garrett, too? According to FanGraphs, Brigham and Garrett have an option available, while Coonrod does not. And just for the record – Coonrod stinks. He has a lifetime 5.54 ERA and a 1.40 WHIP in the majors. My hope is that he never pitches a game for the Mets again.

My opinion is that Bickford is worth having on the 40-man. But if the Mets cut ties with him, it wouldn’t be anything about which to get alarmed. Let’s create three groups from our current 33-man roster. The first is guys who should be upgraded. The second are guys that are more or less cromulent but could be removed for an upgrade. And the final one is guys who will be on the Opening Day 40-man unless they are traded.

Group 1 – Brigham, Coonrod, Garrett, Walker
Group 2 – Bickford, Gott, Hartwig, Murfee, Reid-Foley, Smith, Stewart, Vogelbach
Group 3 – Butto, Diaz, Lucchesi, Megill, Ottavino, Peterson, Quintana, Raley, Senga, Acuna, Alfonso, Alvarez, Baty, Guillorme, Lindor, Mauricio, McNeil, Narvaez, Vientos, Marte, Nimmo

That’s 21 players who are seemingly safe to be on the 40-man when the season starts. And we can certainly quibble about several of those, too. Omar Narvaez’ contract seemingly guarantees his spot but few would be disappointed if the Mets cut him loose. Starling Marte might be in the same boat as Narvaez. Luis Guillorme is a potential non-tender candidate but the Mets have already removed his internal competition.

At the bare minimum, the Mets have 11 additions to the 40-man, made up of the seven spots they’re currently short, along with the four from Group 1 above. It seems likely there will be a couple of additional spots from Group 2, too. A few of these will be minor leaguers added before the Rule 5 Draft. But it just goes to show how much work is to be done in the offseason.

Roughly a year ago, the then-GM was dubbed Quick Draw Billy Eppler for his decisiveness making moves. It will be curious to see how David Stearns acts in this regard. An old roommate of mine told me once that good things come to those who wait but only after the scavengers get first pick. Here’s hoping to Stearns being decisive enough to get first pick while adding the pieces missing at the top of the roster.

He can be deliberate in other phases, so long as the Brigham Bunch is gone by the time that the regular season starts.

3 comments on “How the Mets’ 40-man roster shapes up in early November

  • Metsense

    According to Spotrac:
    Reyes, Locastro, Hernandez and Curtiss didn’t have options so therefore they should have been on outright waivers.
    Monte de Oca and Battenfield did have an option so therefore it was surprising.
    Yet, Bickford and Reid-Foley don’t have options and remain on the roster.
    Brigham, Coonrod, Walker and Garrett have options so therefore they remain on the roster.
    Guillorme (est arb $1.7m MLBTR) and Vogelbach (est arb $2.6Mm MLBTR) don’t have options but should be tendered because they have a chance to make the opening day roster.
    With all the cuts since the end of the season, it is apparent that Stearns did not like the makeup of the roster.

  • TexasGusCC

    I don’t expect Vogelbach or Guillorme to be on the team next year, and I’m happy for Guillorme. I’d like to see the guy get a chance to start somewhere. The Baby Mets and McNeil are enough infielders. Too, I don’t see the need to add a AA guy like Jackson that isn’t close to ready for prime time. He can be added to the AAA team’s roster in order to be protected. Too, de Oca is goi my to be out most of next year and didn’t have the best control even before TJ surgery. Let’s see how he comes out the other side. He can be a minor league signing.

  • T.J.

    Cromulent. Nice word. I think that is Stearns’ goal for 2024. That doesn’t excite me, but it will excite me if we can see tangible upward direction. Your list is sound, and I agree on your takes. With some debate, non-professional GMs like our crew can cobble together something similar at the onset of the offseason. While I am more or less pleased with the Stearns hire, I don’t have much of a feel for his approach. I like that he has NYC roots, but I am concerned that he may be a bit too enamored with the data side of the game. I will go out on a limb and say that he has been preparing for this position long before his interview/hire. I hope that transcends to a logical series of moves this offseason, move that make sense not only individually but more importantly in tandem. Those roster spots 30-40 are quite important. My take it that in most of my recent Met fandom, let’s say the last two decades, those spots have been a big deficit. I’d like to see them as an advantage at some point in 2024, and that starts now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *