We’ve arrived at a fairly standard juncture in a baseball season when fans and pundits opine on where the season is headed based on the results thus far. We’re roughly 30% into the 2024 campaign and, depending on your personal viewpoint, it’s either getting late early or we still need additional time to assess. The discussions have seemed to border on contentious at times, which more likely than not speaks mostly to the frustrations evoked by another iteration of a listless Mets team underperforming even tepid expectations. Being a Mets fan will do that to you sometimes.

The reality of the current postseason format means that teams will inevitably hold on longer than perhaps they should, where even the faintest glimmer of hope will ultimately lead to the regret of not having traded your best assets earlier for a larger return. The Mets find themselves teetering on the precipice of that situation, more or less, at 21-29 and already 15 games behind the first-place Phillies in the NL East. The team is somehow just four games out of playoff positioning, though, so it’s still just early enough that it might not quite make sense to sell off pieces that could otherwise help them nab that last wildcard spot. Maybe?

Still, the FanGraphs Depth Charts projections for the rest of the season peg the Mets at a final record of 76-86. Considering the team with the fewest wins to ever secure a wildcard spot (excluding 2020) was the 2005 Padres with 82 wins, the chances seem slim without a meaningful turnaround. Their normal June swoon appears to have arrived early this season as the team has put up a 6-15 record and -27 run differential in May, and their 2-8 record over the last 10 games certainly doesn’t give any indication of a team on the cusp of a breakout.

Throughout the rest of this season and beyond, no matter its outcome, you’ll continue to see pieces from me and others extolling the performances of some players while lamenting the failings of others. We might wax poetic about what could have been had this or that circumstance have gone differently. But the truth of the matter, at least in this moment and as carried over from the 2023 season, is that this group of players simply isn’t getting it done.

Before the season I wrote a piece with an optimistic slant wondering if the 2024 version of the Mets, for all of the hand-wringing about the lack of splashy moves, might actually be better than the sum of its parts. In fact, the Depth Charts prediction noted earlier had the team winning roughly 88 games with a 39.9 fWAR, which would in theory have given them a very strong chance at a wildcard spot. The current projections have the team’s fWAR at 27.7 with the biggest adjustment down coming from the starting pitching (11.3 vs 5.8), though the projected drop in offense is not far behind it.

The turmoil over the inconsistent offense will likely continue through the summer, but even now their 5.6 fWAR places them squarely in the middle of baseball, which is probably where most of us realistically expected them to land over the course of the 2024 season. Their starting pitching fWAR of 2.5 puts them in the bottom third of the league while their 1.8 reliever fWAR is fifth best in baseball. That sure sounds like a .500 team through-and-through, give or take a few streaks that either lift them above or drop them below that mark at points during the season.

I also wrote a preseason article wondering if the team had an “identity.” Some of the comments were wise in that they stated that we won’t know until the games are played, but can we say they’ve cultivated any kind of identity let alone consistency almost a third of the way through the season? Consider this: they’ve had 45 batting orders through 50 games. For comparison, the Phillies have had 35 and the Braves have had just 26 different lineups.

At this point the team resembles more a collection of parts, some of them broken or malfunctioning, that may simply be too imperfect a fit to put it all together. This collection of parts once again looks like a team that will likely be on the outside looking in come October. In a vacuum it may be a tad early to panic, but in the context of how this team currently looks it sure feels like a continuation of 2023 doesn’t it?

The key question that will need to be answered sooner rather than later is the obvious: where do they go from here? It’s shaping up to be another summer of tough decisions that David Stearns and company will need to make, and this time Steve Cohen may not wait as long to rip the band-aid off.

6 comments on “The 2024 Mets might just be a collection of imperfect parts

  • NYM6986

    You are right on target Rob and each day I see my preseason 88 win and the last wildcard spot prediction getting further from possibility. What we lack on the team is the 2-3 players having big seasons thereby by allowing them to cover for others who 50 games in game still have not found their stroke. There have certainly been a half dozen losses snatched from the jaws of a win, and we would be looking differently at this team if we were around .500 and therefore leading the very crowded wildcard chase. I’ll revert back to my blog last week and reinforce Let’s Make a Deal now ahead of all the other teams that will be looking to dump and reinforce their farm systems.

  • Brian Joura

    To me, it all comes down to how you feel about the SP.

    I feel good about Manaea
    Cautiously optimistic about Scott
    Could go either way on Megill and Severino
    Pessimistic about Quintana
    Hostile to Houser

    It would be a lot better if Senga was here and doing a reasonable facsimile of what he did last year.

    Ultimately, I’m still in the “too soon” camp. I believe the hitting will come around and be good enough. Just not there with the pitching. But a June swoon combined with the rotten May performance is ugly to think about.

  • NYM6986

    Can’t explain why they play so poorly in the month of June. In 2023 they failed to win a single series. If they repeat that it would put us another 10 games under .500 and battling the Marlins for last place. Getting Senga back would be a good start and Alvarez is about to start hitting. We miss his bat and his play behind the plate. At least the Rangers tied their series against a very strong Florida Panthers team.

  • Albert s

    I think they will be better next year.

  • Metsense

    Let’s take a look at the parts that Stearns assembled.
    Severino and Manaea are better than expected. Houser lousy and isn’t better than Butto .
    Lopez is better than expected, Diekman and Ottavino have preformed as expected, Ramirez, Tonkin and Teheran were DFA but they weren’t really expected to contribute . Sulser and Young incomplete.
    Bader and Martinez have performed as expected. Taylor isn’t performing as expected but not too bad. Wendle and Short are DFA. The bench was Stearns Achilles heel and it was compounded by not giving Vientos a chance.
    All in all, Stearns assembled a good off season and is not to blame.
    Maybe it is time to look at the core players and see if they are winners. Let’s face it, they haven’t won anything for a few years.

  • Wayne

    I think the big Achilles Heel right now has to be Diaz . No one expected him to be this bad . On top of that the prospects that we received in the Scherzer and Verlander deals are not performing well at all . I believe Drew Gilbert , ( I think that is his name ) is hurt and Clifford at Binghamton is hitting close or below the Mendoza line . For the life of me I cannot understand what has happened to McNeil. I thought he could get out of bed and hit 300.!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 100 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here