Does Daisuke Matsuzaka have a future with the Mets?

Dice KAfter a dreadful beginning with the Mets, Daisuke Matsuzaka has pitched fabulously over his last four starts, posting a 3-0 record while recording a quality outing in each of last three starts (only missing a quality outing by one/third of an inning in the start before this stretch).

Matsuzaka was simply dominant in the Mets’ 1-0 victory over the Cincinnati Reds on Wednesday afternoon, limiting the Reds to zero runs on four hits and two walks (with six strikeouts) in 7 2/3 innings pitched

In his last four starts, Matsuzaka has completed 26 1/3 innings while giving up just four earned runs on 13 hits and nine walks while also striking out 21 batters.

Can this stretch of good pitching ensure a return for Matsuzaka in orange and blue?

Well, we all know the Mets staff is built on youth and upside and Matsuzaka is the antithesis of that premise. The 33-year-old Japanese veteran is clearly on the back-9 of his career, after pitching most of his career in Boston to mixed results.

In the offseason, Matsuzaka signed with the Indians, but they released him on August 20 after he put up so-so stats (5-8 record, 3.92 ERA and .245 opponents’ batting average in 19 starts) in Columbus (their Triple-A affiliate). The Indians were talking a chance on Matsuzaka after he has since struggled coming back from Tommy John surgery in 2011.

The Mets have long liked the ability of Matsuzaka and with him being a cheap, fallback option for 2014, he can prove to be nice insurance for a team that will rely on some pitching that is young and—let’s face it—not exactly sure bets to stay healthy all season.

We all know the saga involved with Matt Harvey. Then, you also have guys in Jonathon Niese and Dillon Gee who have had significant injuries in the last two years. Throw in the recent injuries to Jenrry Mejia and Jeremy Hefner and it wouldn’t be such a bad idea to bring in a veteran pitcher than can be had in on the cheap. This way the Mets can be patient with the young arms (Rafael Montero, Noah Syndergaard and Jacob deGrom) on the farm.

While Bronson Arroyo’s name is being floated out there as a possible addition to the staff, his price tag will likely be significantly higher than that of Matsuzaka.

Obviously, we shouldn’t get excited about the long-term potential of Matsuzaka, but he is veteran pitcher who gets by on deception and guile. He is a good insurance for team in the Mets that just might need it in 2014.

Matsuzaka is by no means an anchor but with the way he finished this season, he should not just be brushed aside and tossed out with the garbage. Maybe he is finally over the problems that plagued him ever since he had Tommy John surgery.

The Mets should think long and hard about bringing him back in the hopes that he finally past his health issues. Maybe now he’s ready to be a contributing factor to a staff in need of some stability.

Follow me on Twitter @Stacdemon

7 comments for “Does Daisuke Matsuzaka have a future with the Mets?

  1. September 26, 2013 at 10:32 am

    I like a rotation to give opponents different looks and Dice certainly does that. My preference would be to give some of the kids like Montero, JDG and Gorski a shot at the rotation but if Sandy Alderson is set in stone about bringing in a veteran — I’d rather it be Dice than Arroyo on some ridiculous three-year contract.

  2. Name
    September 26, 2013 at 12:35 pm

    I would do the same exact thing the Indians did this year. Stash him in Vegas with no promise of calling him up at any time (give him an opt-out if he desires) and only call him up in dire straits. Otherwise, if another team wants him, just let him walk.

  3. Metsense
    September 26, 2013 at 1:09 pm

    “The Mets have long liked the ability of Matsuzaka and with him being a cheap, fallback option for 2014, he can prove to be nice insurance for a team that will rely on some pitching that is young and—let’s face it—not exactly sure bets to stay healthy all season.”

    You can never have too much pitching and with the recent injuries the Mets need some insurance. A veteran presence on the roster, that isn’t guaranteed a rotation spot, like Dice-K or/and Harang, would always be a prudent move provided they come aboard on a cheap, incentive laden contract for 1 year. Bronson Arroyo, although a good pitcher, does not qualify because of contract length and cost. The money needs to be spent on offense.

  4. Steve Rogers
    September 27, 2013 at 12:58 pm

    I can see a NRI flyer, but nothing beyond that. I liked bringing him in as a warm body during the final months of a cruddy season, but I’m not sure if he’d be good in the situations where the season is taking its shape.

  5. Jim OMalley
    September 27, 2013 at 9:25 pm

    yep…bring him back….we absolutely cannot have enough arms heading into 2014.. He gives us 12 starts in the first of the season, we are ahead of the game.

  6. Fredw
    October 3, 2013 at 9:00 pm

    Heads up on Matsuzaka from Boston. Do you really want this guy in your organization? After 6 years in Boston he was rated
    as 1 of the top 10 despised players of the decade. ( Even Japanese fans are increasingly turned off by him.) As Cleveland Indians realized it,
    Matsuzaka is a really bad investment. Don’t forget his minor league season was : 5 wins and 8 losses with a 3.92 ERA. His pitching
    with Boston, was an up and down roller coaster, plagued by injuries( not only elbow). Why waste the money on him? Why not give a young pitcher a chance? It’s so painful to watch Dice-K’s nibbling around the plate. Also, fans didn’t feel he was a part of the team. Dice-K hasn’t even bothered to learn English in the 7 years that he lived here.

  7. Eric S
    October 10, 2013 at 10:28 pm

    I think the Mets should hire DiceK for 2014. It costs them very little money and he seems to have a significant upside. If, after three or fout starts, he shows that he can’t do it, get rid of him. But it’s, in a sense, a free look.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *